MySQL锁系列(二)之 锁解读

2024-03-05 09:14:06 浏览数 (2)

原文链接

https://keithlan.github.io/2017/06/05/innodb_locks_show_engine/

背景

  1. 锁系列第一期的时候介绍的锁,我们要如何去解读呢?
  2. 在哪里能够看到这些锁?

锁信息解读

工欲善其事必先利其器 show engine innodb status 关于锁的信息是最详细的

案例一(有索引的情况)

  • 前期准备

dba:lc_3> dba:lc_3> dba:lc_3> show create table a; ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Table | Create Table | ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | a | CREATE TABLE `a` ( `a` int(11) NOT NULL, `b` int(11) DEFAULT NULL, `c` int(11) DEFAULT NULL, `d` int(11) DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`a`), UNIQUE KEY `idx_b` (`b`), KEY `idx_c` (`c`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 | ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 row in set (0.00 sec) dba:lc_3> dba:lc_3> select * from a; --- ------ ------ ------ | a | b | c | d | --- ------ ------ ------ | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | --- ------ ------ ------ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

  • 产生锁的语句

dba:lc_3> set tx_isolation = 'repeatable-read'; --事务隔离级别为repeatable-read,以后介绍 Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) begin; select * from a where c=7 for update;

  • show engine innodb status

------------ TRANSACTIONS ------------ Trx id counter 133588132 Purge done for trx's n:o < 133588131 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idle History list length 836 LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION: ---TRANSACTION 421565826149088, not started 0 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 0 row lock(s) ---TRANSACTION 133588131, ACTIVE 8 sec 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 3 row lock(s) MySQL thread id 116, OS thread handle 140001238423296, query id 891 localhost dba cleaning up TABLE LOCK table `lc_3`.`a` trx id 133588131 lock mode IX RECORD LOCKS space id 281 page no 5 n bits 72 index idx_c of table `lc_3`.`a` trx id 133588131 lock_mode X Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000007; asc ;; 1: len 4; hex 80000003; asc ;; RECORD LOCKS space id 281 page no 3 n bits 72 index PRIMARY of table `lc_3`.`a` trx id 133588131 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000003; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66444; asc dD;; 2: len 7; hex fc0000271d011d; asc ' ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; 4: len 4; hex 80000007; asc ;; 5: len 4; hex 80000009; asc ;; RECORD LOCKS space id 281 page no 5 n bits 72 index idx_c of table `lc_3`.`a` trx id 133588131 lock_mode X locks gap before rec Record lock, heap no 4 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000009; asc ;; 1: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;;

  • show engine innodb status 解读

* Trx id counter 133588132 描述的是:下一个事务的id为133588132 * Purge done for trx's n:o < 133588131 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idle Purge线程已经将trxid小于133588131的事务都purge了,目前purge线程的状态为idle Purge线程无法控制 * History list length 836 undo中未被清除的事务数量,如果这个值非常大,说明系统来不及回收undo,需要人工介入了。 疑问:上面的purge都已经刷新完了,为什么History list length 不等于0,这是一个有意思的问题 * ---TRANSACTION 133588131, ACTIVE 8 sec 当前事务id为133588131 * 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 3 row lock(s) 产生了4个锁对象结构,占用内存大小1136字节,3条记录被锁住(1个表锁,3个记录锁) * TABLE LOCK table `lc_3`.`a` trx id 133588131 lock mode IX 在a表上面有一个表锁,这个锁的模式为IX(排他意向锁) * RECORD LOCKS space id 281 page no 5 n bits 72 index idx_c of table `lc_3`.`a` trx id 133588131 lock_mode X 在space id=281(a表的表空间),page no=5的页上,对表a上的idx_c索引加了记录锁,锁模式为:next-key 锁(这个在上一节中有告知) 该页上面的位图锁占有72bits * 具体锁了哪些记录 Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 0 -- heap no 3 的记录被锁住了 0: len 4; hex 80000007; asc ;; --这是一个二级索引上的锁,7被锁住 1: len 4; hex 80000003; asc ;; --二级索引上面还会自带一个主键,所以主键值3也会被锁住 RECORD LOCKS space id 281 page no 3 n bits 72 index PRIMARY of table `lc_3`.`a` trx id 133588131 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap(这是一个记录锁,在主键上锁住的) Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000003; asc ;; --第一个字段是主键3,占用4个字节,被锁住了 1: len 6; hex 000007f66444; asc dD;; --该字段为6个字节的事务id,这个id表示最近一次被更新的事务id 2: len 7; hex fc0000271d011d; asc ' ;; --该字段为7个字节的回滚指针,用于mvcc 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; --该字段表示的是此记录的第二个字段5 4: len 4; hex 80000007; asc ;; --该字段表示的是此记录的第三个字段7 5: len 4; hex 80000009; asc ;; --该字段表示的是此记录的第四个字段9 RECORD LOCKS space id 281 page no 5 n bits 72 index idx_c of table `lc_3`.`a` trx id 133588131 lock_mode X locks gap before rec Record lock, heap no 4 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000009; asc ;; --这是一个二级索引上的锁,9被锁住 1: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; --二级索引上面还会自带一个主键,所以主键值5被锁住

案例二(无索引的情况)

  • 前期准备

dba:lc_3> show create table t; ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Table | Create Table | ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | t | CREATE TABLE `t` ( `i` int(11) DEFAULT NULL ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 | ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) dba:lc_3> select * from t; ------ | i | ------ | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 | ------ 16 rows in set (0.00 sec)

  • 产生锁语句

dba:lc_3> set tx_isolation = 'repeatable-read'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) dba:lc_3> select * from t where i=1 for update; ------ | i | ------ | 1 | ------ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)

  • show engine innodb status

------------ TRANSACTIONS ------------ Trx id counter 133588133 Purge done for trx's n:o < 133588131 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idle History list length 836 LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION: ---TRANSACTION 421565826149088, not started 0 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 0 row lock(s) ---TRANSACTION 133588132, ACTIVE 6 sec 2 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 17 row lock(s) MySQL thread id 118, OS thread handle 140001238955776, query id 904 localhost dba cleaning up TABLE LOCK table `lc_3`.`t` trx id 133588132 lock mode IX RECORD LOCKS space id 278 page no 3 n bits 88 index GEN_CLUST_INDEX of table `lc_3`.`t` trx id 133588132 lock_mode X Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;; Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff05; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66397; asc c ;; 2: len 7; hex fb0000271c0110; asc ' ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff06; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f663ea; asc c ;; 2: len 7; hex bb000027340110; asc '4 ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000002; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 4 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff07; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66426; asc d&;; 2: len 7; hex e4000040210110; asc @! ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000003; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 5 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff08; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66427; asc d';; 2: len 7; hex e5000040220110; asc @" ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000004; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 6 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff09; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f6642c; asc d,;; 2: len 7; hex e8000040230110; asc @# ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 7 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff0a; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f6642d; asc d-;; 2: len 7; hex e9000040240110; asc @$ ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 8 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff0b; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66432; asc d2;; 2: len 7; hex ec0000273f0110; asc '? ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 9 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff0c; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66433; asc d3;; 2: len 7; hex ed000040020110; asc @ ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 10 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff0d; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66434; asc d4;; 2: len 7; hex ee000040030110; asc @ ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 11 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff0e; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66435; asc d5;; 2: len 7; hex ef000040040110; asc @ ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 12 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff0f; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66436; asc d6;; 2: len 7; hex f0000040050110; asc @ ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 13 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff10; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66437; asc d7;; 2: len 7; hex f1000040060110; asc @ ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 14 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff11; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66438; asc d8;; 2: len 7; hex f2000027130110; asc ' ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 15 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff12; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f66439; asc d9;; 2: len 7; hex f3000027140110; asc ' ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 16 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff13; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f6643a; asc d:;; 2: len 7; hex f4000027150110; asc ' ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; Record lock, heap no 17 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 6; hex 0000000dff14; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000007f6643b; asc d;;; 2: len 7; hex f5000027160110; asc ' ;; 3: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;;

  • 锁解读

1. 这里只列出跟第一个案例不同的地方解读,其他的都一样 2. RECORD LOCKS space id 278 page no 3 n bits 88 index GEN_CLUST_INDEX of table `lc_3`.`t` trx id 133588132 lock_mode X 由于表定义没有显示的索引,而InnoDB又是索引组织表,会自动创建一个索引,这里面叫index GEN_CLUST_INDEX 3. 由于没有索引,那么会对每条记录都加上lock_mode X (next-key lock) 4. 这里有一个明显不一样的是: Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;; supremum 值得是页里面的最后一条记录(伪记录,通过select查不到的,并不是真实的记录),heap no=1 , Infimum 表示的是页里面的第一个记录(伪记录) 可以简单的认为: supremum 为upper bounds,正去穷大 Infimum 为Minimal bounds,负无穷大 那这里的加锁的意思就是:通过supremum 锁住index GEN_CLUST_INDEX的最大值到正无穷大的区间,这样就可以锁住全部记录,以及全部间隙,相当于表锁

锁开销

  • 锁10条记录和锁1条记录的开销是成正比的吗?

1. 由于锁的内存对象针对的是页而不是记录,所以开销并不是非常大 2. 锁10条记录和锁1条记录的内存开销都是一样的,都是heap size=1136个字节

最后

这里面select * from a where c=7 for update; 明明只锁一条记录,为什么却看到4把锁呢? 看到这里是不是有点晕,没关系,这个问题,后面会慢慢揭晓答案

0 人点赞