问题现象：
在自己的工作站中安装的RAC测试环境，使用了iSCSI模拟共享存储，环境运行OK，但是在messages信息中频繁报错如下：
代码语言：javascript复制[root@db01rac2 ~]# tail -20f /var/log/messages
Jan 13 23:08:37 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: connecting to 192.168.1.10:3260
Jan 13 23:08:37 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: connected local port 64350 to 192.168.1.10:3260
Jan 13 23:08:37 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: login response status 0000
Jan 13 23:08:37 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: deleting a scheduled/waiting thread!
Jan 13 23:08:37 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: connection1:0 is operational after recovery (1 attempts)
Jan 13 23:08:39 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 1:0 error (1020 - ISCSI_ERR_TCP_CONN_CLOSE: TCP connection closed) state (3)
Jan 13 23:08:39 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: re-opening session 1 (reopen_cnt 0)
Jan 13 23:08:39 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: disconnecting conn 0x55beee57de90, fd 6
Jan 13 23:08:39 db01rac2 kernel: connection1:0: detected conn error (1020)
Jan 13 23:08:41 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: Poll was woken by an alarm
Jan 13 23:08:41 db01rac2 iscsid: iscsid: re-opening session 1 (reopen_cnt 0)的说法是：
This is normal and can be safely ignored. The error sequence indicates that there was a temporary problem in connectivity to the storage backend but it was safely recovered within seconds.
但是，这是持续在/var/log/messages中报错的，虽然未影响RAC使用，但是总觉得这样刷日志肯定是不正常的，继续查询：
在suse的一篇文章中，
- https://www.suse.com/zh-cn/support/kb/doc/?id=000020752
The systemd journal, by default also written to /var/log/messages, fills with similar messages when an iSCSI LUN is shared across multiple nodes.
这个写的场景很匹配，我这里就是两个节点共享同样的iSCSI LUN，但是究竟能否忽略这个错误呢？ 或是有别的设置？
1.确保IQN的名字唯一性
如果我们需要避免这样的情况发生。需要在节点上修改IQN，避免重名。 而其实我这里原本这个文件是不一样的，但确实在配置时修改成一样的了：
cat /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi
代码语言：javascript复制[root@db01rac1 ~]# cat /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi
#InitiatorName=iqn.1988-12.com.oracle:178a747c44
InitiatorName=iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6:client
[root@db01rac2 ~]# cat /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi
#InitiatorName=iqn.1988-12.com.oracle:b8e5b14ad0fa
InitiatorName=iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6:client可是如果不一样的话，按我现在的配置，就无法识别开机启动挂载盘；
那为何无法识别？是不是iSCSI服务端的ACL配置问题？
下面来验证下，先把 /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi 改回默认值，两个节点不一样；
代码语言：javascript复制[root@db01rac1 ~]# cat /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi
InitiatorName=iqn.1988-12.com.oracle:178a747c44
[root@db01rac2 ~]# cat /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi
InitiatorName=iqn.1988-12.com.oracle:b8e5b14ad0fa如果不重启机器，直接尝试logout和login是没问题的：
代码语言：javascript复制iscsiadm -m node
iscsiadm -m discovery -t st -p 192.168.1.10
iscsiadm -m node -T iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6 -p 192.168.1.10 --login
--以节点2为例：
[root@db01rac2 ~]# iscsiadm -m node -T iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6 -p 192.168.1.10 --logout
Logging out of session [sid: 1, target: iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6, portal: 192.168.1.10,3260]
Logout of [sid: 1, target: iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6, portal: 192.168.1.10,3260] successful.
[root@db01rac2 ~]#
[root@db01rac2 ~]#
[root@db01rac2 ~]# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
vdb 251:16 0 100G 0 disk
└─ora-u01 252:2 0 100G 0 lvm /u01
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
vda 251:0 0 10G 0 disk
├─vda2 251:2 0 9G 0 part
│ ├─ol-swap 252:1 0 1G 0 lvm [SWAP]
│ └─ol-root 252:0 0 8G 0 lvm /
└─vda1 251:1 0 1G 0 part /boot
[root@db01rac2 ~]#
[root@db01rac2 ~]#
[root@db01rac2 ~]# iscsiadm -m node -T iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6 -p 192.168.1.10 --login
Logging in to [iface: default, target: iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6, portal: 192.168.1.10,3260] (multiple)
Login to [iface: default, target: iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6, portal: 192.168.1.10,3260] successful.
[root@db01rac2 ~]#
[root@db01rac2 ~]#
[root@db01rac2 ~]# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sdf 8:80 0 1G 0 disk
sdd 8:48 0 1G 0 disk
vdb 251:16 0 100G 0 disk
└─ora-u01 252:2 0 100G 0 lvm /u01
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
sdg 8:96 0 30G 0 disk
sde 8:64 0 1G 0 disk
vda 251:0 0 10G 0 disk
├─vda2 251:2 0 9G 0 part
│ ├─ol-swap 252:1 0 1G 0 lvm [SWAP]
│ └─ol-root 252:0 0 8G 0 lvm /
└─vda1 251:1 0 1G 0 part /boot
sdh 8:112 0 16G 0 disk但是如果重启了机器，会发现现有配置无法正常login操作：
代码语言：javascript复制[root@db01rac1 ~]# iscsiadm -m node
192.168.1.10:3260,1 iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6
[root@db01rac1 ~]# iscsiadm -m node -T iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6 -p 192.168.1.10 --login
Logging in to [iface: default, target: iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6, portal: 192.168.1.10,3260] (multiple)
iscsiadm: Could not login to [iface: default, target: iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6, portal: 192.168.1.10,3260].
iscsiadm: initiator reported error (24 - iSCSI login failed due to authorization failure)
iscsiadm: Could not log into all portals2.修正iSCSI服务端ACL的配置
看起来真是iSCSI服务端ACL的配置问题，那就去服务端看下acl的配置：
代码语言：javascript复制acl
/> cd /iscsi/iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6/tpg1/acls/
/iscsi/iqn.20...2b6/tpg1/acls> create iqn.1988-12.com.oracle:178a747c44
/iscsi/iqn.20...2b6/tpg1/acls> create iqn.1988-12.com.oracle:b8e5b14ad0fa
/iscsi/iqn.20...2b6/tpg1/acls> delete iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6:client再次节点1尝试login，发现果然成功：
代码语言：javascript复制[root@db01rac1 ~]# iscsiadm -m node -T iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6 -p 192.168.1.10 --login
Logging in to [iface: default, target: iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6, portal: 192.168.1.10,3260] (multiple)
Login to [iface: default, target: iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6, portal: 192.168.1.10,3260] successful.ACL的配置我改为两个RAC节点的，删除了之前的配置，具体最终显示如下：
代码语言：javascript复制/iscsi/iqn.20...2b6/tpg1/acls> pwd
/iscsi/iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.storage.x8664:sn.d5fd6c3922b6/tpg1/acls
/iscsi/iqn.20...2b6/tpg1/acls> ls
o- acls .................................................................................................................. [ACLs: 2]
o- iqn.1988-12.com.oracle:178a747c44 ............................................................................ [Mapped LUNs: 5]
| o- mapped_lun0 ......................................................................................... [lun0 block/disk1 (rw)]
| o- mapped_lun1 ......................................................................................... [lun1 block/disk2 (rw)]
| o- mapped_lun2 ......................................................................................... [lun2 block/disk3 (rw)]
| o- mapped_lun3 ......................................................................................... [lun3 block/disk4 (rw)]
| o- mapped_lun4 ......................................................................................... [lun4 block/disk5 (rw)]
o- iqn.1988-12.com.oracle:b8e5b14ad0fa .......................................................................... [Mapped LUNs: 5]
o- mapped_lun0 ......................................................................................... [lun0 block/disk1 (rw)]
o- mapped_lun1 ......................................................................................... [lun1 block/disk2 (rw)]
o- mapped_lun2 ......................................................................................... [lun2 block/disk3 (rw)]
o- mapped_lun3 ......................................................................................... [lun3 block/disk4 (rw)]
o- mapped_lun4 ......................................................................................... [lun4 block/disk5 (rw)]
/iscsi/iqn.20...2b6/tpg1/acls>这样，最终测试，重启两个rac节点，磁盘挂载正常，且再次查询/var/log/messages信息，不再有iscsi的报错。 其实这个问题早在很多年前的测试我就遇到过，当时没有查出来原因就忽略了，因为也不影响测试，又不是自己的专业范围，而如今本着成长型思维，注重这些细节，终于还是找到了原因。最后看着清爽的messages信息，还是有些成就感的_
