故事背景
在一个Spring的项目中,想做2个AOP切面,分别为AspectA与AspectB,并且AspectA的优先级要比AspectB的高,于是想当然地在AspectA加上注解@Order(Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE)
,在AspectB加上注解@Order
。
因此工程启动后,报错:Required to bind 2 arguments, but only bound 1 (JoinPointMatch was NOT bound in invocation)。
错误栈为:
代码语言:java复制java.lang.IllegalStateException: Required to bind 2 arguments, but only bound 1 (JoinPointMatch was NOT bound in invocation)
at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AbstractAspectJAdvice.argBinding(AbstractAspectJAdvice.java:596) ~[spring-aop-5.3.24.jar:5.3.24]
at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AbstractAspectJAdvice.invokeAdviceMethod(AbstractAspectJAdvice.java:624) ~[spring-aop-5.3.24.jar:5.3.24]
at org.springframework.aop.aspectj.AspectJAroundAdvice.invoke(AspectJAroundAdvice.java:72) ~[spring-aop-5.3.24.jar:5.3.24]
at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:175) ~[spring-aop-5.3.24.jar:5.3.24]
at org.springframework.aop.framework.CglibAopProxy$CglibMethodInvocation.proceed(CglibAopProxy.java:763) ~[spring-aop-5.3.24.jar:5.3.24]
at org.springframework.aop.framework.CglibAopProxy$DynamicAdvisedInterceptor.intercept(CglibAopProxy.java:708) ~[spring-aop-5.3.24.jar:5.3.24]
解决方案
高优先级的AspectA的优先级值,要至少要大于Integer.MIN_VALUE 1
,即@Order(Integer.MIN_VALUE 2)
或@Order(Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE 2)
@Aspect
@Component
@Slf4j
@Order(Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE 2)
public class AspectA {
@Around("@annotation(catTransaction)")
public Object aroundMethod(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp, CatTransaction catTransaction) throws Throwable {
// 获取注解信息
System.out.println("aspectA");
return pjp.proceed();
}
}
原因分析
SpringAop为在容器启动时,事先创建内部的拦截器类ExposeInvocationInterceptor
,它的优先级被设置为最高:Integer.MIN_VALUE 1。源码如下:
@SuppressWarnings("serial")
public final class ExposeInvocationInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, PriorityOrdered, Serializable {
...
@Override
public int getOrder() {
return PriorityOrdered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE 1;
}
...
因此,各种AOP的拦截器类,包括Spring内部使用的,以及我们自定义的拦截器类,都会被扫描放到集合容器中,并且按照优先级有低到高去排序。如果我们的自定义切面类被设置的小于等于Integer.MIN_VALUE 1,就会使得ExposeInvocationInterceptor的优先级被动调低了,不能率先去执行其增强逻辑,从而引发内部异常
有关ExposeInvocationInterceptor的原理,请参阅ExposeInvocationInterceptor的原理