Nicolas Fränkel is a Developer Advocate with 15 years experience consulting for many different customers, in a wide range of contexts (such as telecoms, banking, insurances, large retail and public sector). Usually working on Java/Java EE and Spring technologies, but with focused interests like Rich Internet Applications, Testing, CI/CD and DevOps. Currently working for Exoscale. Also double as a teacher in universities and higher education schools, a trainer and triples as a book author.
Unfortunately, I must admit I have a hard time reading the documentation of Scala collections e.g.:
不幸的是，我必须承认我很难阅读Scala集合的文档，例如：
trait LinearSeq [ A] extends Seq[A] with collection.LinearSeq[A] with GenericTraversableTemplate[A, LinearSeq] with LinearSeqLike[A, LinearSeq[A]]
Hence, I will only describe collections from the Kotlin side.
Iterator
At the root of Kotlin’s Collection API lies the Iterator interface, similar to Java’s. But the similitude stops after that. java.util.ListIterator features are broken down into different contracts:
ListIteratorto move the iterator index forward and backwardMutableIteratorto remove content from the iteratorMutableListIteratorinherits from the 2 interfaces above to mimic the entire contract ofjava.util.ListIterator
在Kotlin的Collection API的根源是Iterator接口，类似于Java。但在此之后，相似之处就停止了。java.util.ListIterator 功能分为不同的协议：
ListIterator向前和向后移动迭代器索引MutableIterator从迭代器中删除内容MutableListIterator从上面的2个接口继承来模仿整个合同java.util.ListIterator
Collection, List and Set
The hierarchy of collections in Kotlin are very similar as in Java: Collection, Listand Set. (I won’t detail maps, but they follow the same design). The only, but huge, difference is that it’s divided between mutable and immutable types. Mutable types have methods to change their contents (e.g. add() andset()`), while immutable types don’t.
Of course, the hierarchy is a bit more detailed compared to Java, but that’s expected from a language that benefits from its parent’s experience.
Kotlin 集合类的层次结构和Java非常相似：Collection，List和Set。（我不会详细说明地图，但它们遵循相同的设计）。唯一但又巨大的区别在于它分为可变类型和不可变类型。可变类型具有改变其内容的方法（例如 add() andset()`），而不可变类型则不具有。
当然，与Java相比，层次结构更加详细, 毕竟是基于Java基础之上的。
image
Implementations
IMHO, the important bit about Kotlin collections is not their hierarchy - though it’s important to understand about the difference between mutable and immutable.
As Java developers know, there’s no such things as out-of-the-box immutable collection types in Java. When an immutable collection is required, the mutable collection must be wrapped into an unmodifiable type via a call to the relevant Collections.unmodifiableXXX(). But unmodifiable types are not public, they are private in Collections: types returned are generic ones (List or Set interfaces). It means they implement all methods of the standard collections. Immutability comes from the mutable-related methods throwing exceptions: at compile time, there’s no way to differentiate between a mutable and an immutable collection.
On the opposite, Kotlin offers a clean separation between mutable and immutable types. It also provides dedicated functions to create objects of the relevant type:
相反，Kotlin提供了可变类型和不可变类型之间的清晰分离。它还提供专用函数来创建相关类型的对象：
image
As opposed to Scala, Kotlin doesn’t implement its own collection types, it reuses those from Java. That means that even when the compile-time type is immutable, the runtime type is always mutable. The downside is that it’s possible to change the collection elements by casting it to the correct runtime type. IMHO, this is no more severe than what allows standard reflection. There are several advantages, though:
- Faster time-to-market
- Java collection types benefited from years of improvement
- The underlying implementation can be changed in the future with full backward compatibility
To go further:
- Kotlin documentation on collections
